Appraising the Role of Key Actors in International Environmental Law-Making Process: Essence and Constraints

Abstract

This paper examined Actors and Law-Making Processes under International Environmental Law. The development and implementation of international environmental law involved a complex interplay of diverse actors, including states, international organizations, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), the scientific community, and the private sector. This paper adopted the doctrinal method of research with primary of information derived from international conventions, protocol, charters, and treaties, while the secondary sources were derived from journal articles and internet sources. This paper explored the roles and interactions of these actors in shaping environmental law on a global scale. International environmental law emerged prominently in the later half of the 20th century, with milestones such as the 1972 Stockholm Conference and the 1992 Rio Earth Summit. These events set the stage for a series of treaties and agreements aimed at addressing transboundary environmental issues and promoting sustainable development. The paper found out that each issue required coordinated action across national borders, highlighted the need for robust legal frameworks and effective implementation mechanisms. The paper concluded that the effectiveness of international environmental law depends on the active participation and cooperation of all relevant actors. The paper recommended amongst others the need to enhance international cooperation through more inclusive and transparent negotiation processes, develop more robust mechanisms for monitoring and enforcing compliance with international agreements, ensure fair distribution of responsibilities and resources between developed and developing nations.

Scholarly discussion is intended for respectful academic engagement, critique, clarification, and knowledge exchange. Comments are moderated to preserve the integrity of the journal community.

All comments are subject to moderation to preserve scholarly quality and community standards. Do not include confidential peer-review, reviewer identity, private manuscript, or submission information.

Sign in or create an account to participate in the scholarly discussion.